Biking is one of the great things in living in Palo Alto. This is the freeway underpass that goes to the bay.
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Freeway underpass
Biking is one of the great things in living in Palo Alto. This is the freeway underpass that goes to the bay.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
°N
°N
Walfredo Cirne2009-09-30
The fact the world uses two temperature scales has always bothered me.
Why not use the brilliant °C system? 0°C = water freezing. 100°C = water boiling. Clean, simple, elegant! And even practical! 0°C is a temperature that many humans live with, making it ease for people to have a sense of it.
°F in contrast, has freezing as 32°F. Water boiling is 212°F. 100°F is the temperature of someone slightly ill. Completely arbitrary, isn’t it?
But there must have been a reason for °F. Someone, I imagine a smart early scientist, thought of it. There must be an explanation.
Decided to find out, I searched the Internet. :-)
Fahrenheit: Thermometer scale in which the freezing point of water is 32°F and the boiling point of water 212°F.
The Fahrenheit scale is still obstinately in use in the US. This anachronism requires conversion from Centigrade (°C) to Fahrenheit (°F), and vice versa.
One degree °C = (5/9)(°F - 32).
One degree °F = (9/5)(°C) + 32.
Named for Gabriel Fahrenheit, a German-Dutch physicist, who devised the scale in 1724. 0°F was the lowest temperature that Fahrenheit could obtain using a mixture of ice and salt.
It doesn't make sense, does it? Why someone presumably smart would pick "the freezing point of water is 32°F and the boiling point of water 212°F"?
After much thought, I believe the key for this mystery is that 100°F is the temperature of someone slightly ill. I think the idea was for 100°F to be the average temperature of a human being, which of course is not the best, reproducible reference for you to anchor your temperature scale. But the idea behind it was good: 100°F being body temperature. Today, we know this is 37°C = 98.6°F.
So… we could think of a temperature scale that combines the best of °C and °F.
Natural Degrees = °N!!!
0°N = freezing water. 100°N = average human body. 0°N = 0°C = 32°F. 100°N = 37°C = 98.6°F. This way both 0 and 100 have practical meaning, temperatures that we can relate to in daily life. 0 After all, boiling water may be a nice place for you to anchor your temperature scale, but is not a temperature we experience at all. By the way, boiling water = 270°N.
And °N are quite intuitive. As the name suggests, they feel natural. Around 70°N is great weather, over 100°N is hot, near 0°N is cool. In general, near 0, °N behaves like °C. Near 100, °N is like °F. All in all, a perfectly reasonable and intuitive temperature scale.
(If you wanna give it a try, the formulas are °C = 37/100°N, °N = 100/37°C , °N = 500/33(°F - 32), and °F = 333/500°N + 32. And the temperature scales °F and °N intersect each other at 95.8°F = 95.8°N. Of course, by definition, 0°N = 0°C. And, as everybody knows, -40°C = -40°F ... Sorry! Got carried over! :-)
Anyhow, where were we?
Ah, right! When °N become the dominant temperature scale, we can introduce °NK, the Natural-Kelvin. You know, K = Kelvin, the scientific scale. (How come K is not °K?? the ° is gone?!? haven’t people heard of orthogonality?!?)
Anyhow, 0K is absolute zero. The lower possible theoretical temperature, where there is no movement of atoms... or something like that. :-) But, of course, you need two places to anchor a temperature scale. Kelvin people did (x+1)K - xK = 1°C or, equivalently, xK - yK = x°C - y°C. In English: that K increase at the same speed as °C. This means that 0K = -273.15 °C. Therefore, 0°C = 273.15K and 100°C = 373.15K.
So... you guessed! x°N - y°N = x°NK - y°NK, or °NK increases at the same pace as °N. (We are, of course, keeping things orthogonal… :-) Therefore, 0°N = 738.24°NC, and 100°N = 838.24°NC, and the formulas and interesting values ...
Well, never mind!! Two common use temperature scales are already too many. :-) Better leave things as they are... Moreover, it could give someone the idea that Rankine Degrees = °R are actually a reasonable idea. :-)
